Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nissan Pitcher's avatar

What I think is missing here is an active component. By this I would ask is society itself and it's needs are not a factor? Do we ask if it is a boy or a girl and the treatment afterwords not culture trying to assert itself? The Boy and Girl dynamics have a direct impact on the future of the tribe does it not. So Manhood and Woman Hood should also be looked at by the results produced in society and its trajectory into the future right? Today we have an open question as to what is a Women. Is this having a positive or negative effect on society? Has it been beneficial? With the rise of depression and the decline in families and birth rates I would not think so. So I would not deem it wise to question what is a man but what role men must play and want needs to be contributed to society. Manhood should not be simply looked at as a list of traits one does or does not have but how one uses there triats. The one most defining feature of all men is that we are born without value as we can not produce children so we are disposable. However this may soon no longer be the case. I will soon bring this up in my vision of a framework man is my frist post. The Proposal.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts